It’s Just Like a Jackass…

…to propose instituting a universal healthcare system, when the federal budget (and deficit) is out of control, economic recession is looming (if not here), and annual reports constantly point out the incredible waste and inadequacy of current government healthcare (whether Medicare or Veterans Affairs hospitals). Remember the reports of poor treatment offered to stateside Iraqi war veterans? And then there’s the recent spread in the April 20th, 2008 issue of Parade magazine. Entitled, “The Looting of Medicare,” the article estimates $70 billion of Medicare’s $400 billion budget for 2008 will be lost due to mismanagement and fraud.

Hot on the heels of this report on Medicare’s sterling record, the Clinton campaign quietly informed the public this week that instituting Hillary’s healthcare plan will require a tax hike that will take “5-10% of the average taxpayer’s annual income”. The consequence of Hillary or Obama’s healthcare idiocy is perhaps best illustrated in visual terms:

Universal healthcare might seem like a good thing on the surface. Americans like to think of themselves as compassionate people, and compassionate people do not deny medical care to others. But “universal healthcare” (which I would distinguish from universal emergency care–which we currently do have in this country), is a good example of the old adage about how the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Good intentions have to be wed to sound policy, science, and economics. Those who suggest a government mandated universal healthcare system are in fact advocating something that is the surest way to guarantee inadequate healthcare for all (and send the country, and perhaps the rest of the world–based as it is on the American economy–spiraling into economic depression).

I saw firsthand the criminal inhumanity of government healthcare during the years I volunteered at the Truman Restorative Center (a state run elderly care facility). Government excels at waste, because it is practically immune from numerous mechanisms of accountability that are present in the private (capitalist) sector. Government programs are, for all intents and purposes, protected monopolies. Monopolies are never good, for they allow stagnation, squelch innovation, and make efficient allocation of resources unnecessary. Capitalism has allowed such rapid technological and economic progress because it thrives on the adaptation that comes from competition.

In the private sector, if you’re not profitable and can’t do things efficiently, you go bankrupt, and can lose your house, credit rating, and possessions. Not so with government. Elected officials can spend money that isn’t theirs, and suffer no personal fiscal loss or consequence when their schemes destroy lives or fail miserably. Which of course is one reason we have so much pork-barrel spending and ceaseless government scandals. It is far more difficult to fire an incompetent, federally employed worker than someone in the private sector. It’s not irrational to suggest more people will die from medical malpractice under a callous, unaccountable government system.

Capitalism, not government socialism, has provided more prosperity, security, and more beneficial healthcare than any other system in the world. Some sort of healthcare reform is necessary, but it must be driven by innovation more than regulation.

The founders of this nation believed in limited government, because they knew the propensity of government for tyranny and waste. Read the Federalist Papers and other works of the founding fathers, and you begin to understand the brilliance of this nation grew out of a belief in the ingenuity and hard-work of individuals, and the freedom of those individuals from significant government regulations and mandates. Government was only intended to do what individuals and local communities absolutely could not do for themselves (such as negotiate with foreign powers and defend the nation militarily). I believe the founders would have heard Obama and Clinton’s plans for universal healthcare, and understood the economic disaster (and therefore disastrous level of healthcare) that would result from implementing such a proposal.


5 Responses to “It’s Just Like a Jackass…”

  1. Pappy Says:

    The photo above is not funny.
    Donkey’s are abused in many parts of the world.
    Only bastards would have poor donkey’s pull outrageous
    And I mean BASTARDS.
    I hope donkeys kick these monsters in the face hard.

    • artaban7 Says:

      Dear “Pappy”, the photo was never intended to be funny. It was intended to visually illustrate the ludicrous nature of “universal healthcare”, which is a system that turns citizens into “poor donkeys (sadled with) outrageous loads”.

    • Wakeupdumbass Says:

      Thats what jackasses are for idiot. What is there a wieght limit.

  2. Rosie Says:

    Very jackass-like simplistic article. If healthcare assurance for all is not provided soon, the chances of this great nation becoming even greater are significantly diminished. It is morally wrong and reprehensible to state that all don’t deserve healthcare. As a pro-lifer, I am pro-life throughout, not just for the unborn. Have a heart and support health care.

  3. artaban7 Says:

    Rosie, pardon me for actually providing facts to back up my argument. You might want to do a close reading of my text, as I NEVER claimed “all don’t deserve healthcare”. I cannot help it if you distort my message–that is your fault, not mine.

    For clarity’s sake, I’ve provided a partial rebuttal to your fallacious claims, at the following link:

    I am pro-life, but I am not an idiot who thinks we can provide unlimited healthcare in a Fallen world, with limited resources. There simply aren’t enough doctors to go around. And there never will be with the fiscal measures necessary to run a government system. Hence my comment that, “The road to Hell is paved with good intentions”.

    This is precisely why Pope Benedict had to remind people in his latest encyclical that charity that is not founded on truth is not charity at all, and will be unable to bring about the beneficent outcome for which it aims. Government run healthcare, while well-intentioned, will result in lower quality healthcare for all, because it is not based on psychologically, economically, or fiscally sound policies.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: